row, row your boat
Gently down the stream,
Merrily, merrily merrily, merrily,
Life is but a dream.
library search discloses that this ‘round’ is from an ancient text of
unknown origin. The “Great Songs Thesaurus’ says the earliest found
publication of these words was in 1852: the music was added in 1881.
In case you wonder, there is a spiritual interpretation of this song
given at the end.
words may trigger fond memories of pleasant outings for many readers.
I certainly hope they do for you, but you may wonder; what this has
to do with the title of this paper? It has to do with the fact that
those who can accept the concept that life is a dream have experienced
a profound change in their opinions and attitudes toward life related
to their new understanding of it. It has allowed me, and others, to
form a higher view of life than we had ever considered before. One recent
believer said, I quote,
there is a great difference in how one walks
upon the earth when it is viewed as a life dream, as opposed
to a hard physical reality.
This is true without in any way diminishing the significance of the
lessons involved.” Another said “ It is an extremely challenging topic,
and most people probably are not ready to deal with it. But a
few are, and once they are exposed to it, oh what a difference it will
make. Others will come along later. This is a key, I think,
in our evolution back toward our previous spiritual state.”
Of course those words were rewarding to me. I hope they will
encourage you to investigate it seriously. Here is a most appropriate
quotation in this regard. “There are two ways to slide easily through
life: to believe everything or to doubt everything. Both ways save us
presenting this information, I will draw almost exclusively upon what
has been said by both ancient and modern mystics and heavily upon the
Edgar Cayce Readings in particular. If we are ever to obtain an adequate
understanding of life, one that answers our many questions, it will
most likely come from the ranks of the mystics. They demonstrate unusual
abilities that I believe are due to soul development of a positive type.
Most express many admirable qualities such as kindness, optimism, encouragement,
compassion, honesty and many other attributes that have been collectively
called “fruits of the spirit”. They often expend great effort to help
people in any way that they need help. Many if not all have had a transcendental
experience and so I believe they are speaking from first-hand knowledge
and not just from an opinion.
first reaction to this may be to say that they are hard to understand.
Such obstacles often arise because almost all verbal communication is
based upon shared experience.
Knowledge gained thru transcendental experience is difficult
to share or describe. It is of the same degree of difficulty as trying
to explain color to a person born colorblind. Still there is some communication
that is clear and if we only benefit from that part it is worthwhile.
also need to acknowledge our own limitations. The wisdom of the Readings
shines thru in this area. Reading # 1297-1 says: “What is truth today
may tomorrow be only partially so, to a developing soul.” It suggests
that we need to grow inwardly before larger truths will ‘fit’ us.
We should not expect to be able to grasp truth the instant we
hear it. It is also correct
to say that our efforts earn us the right to know truth, as in “Seek
and ye shall find.” Even after we overcome these, there is another important
step. It doesn’t much matter what you say you believe. What does matter
is what difference what you say you believe makes in your life.
have heard it said that many of the teachings of mystics could be reduced
in essence to two simple expressions. These are “As above, so below”
and “As within, so without.” Once you are aware of them you will soon
confirm their truth, as I have to myself. Applying them can provide
insights and answers not available ordinarily. An example of the first
from the Readings is “All one sees manifest in a material world is but
a reflection or shadow of the real or spiritual life.” # 262-23: and
of the second is “For self is constantly meeting self.” # 1771-2
say that the Edgar Cayce readings can be unclear or confusing.
While I cannot understand them all, it was not hard to follow
what he said about reincarnation [many lives]. I had heard about reincarnation
before but only he gave me incentive enough to pursue the subject. For
that I am enormously grateful. I must admit that my chief motivation
for making an intensive effort to learn more about it was because it
was important to me to be correct in my beliefs, not because I knew
how beneficial it would be. Being aware of those benefits earlier would
have been helpful. Only much later did I recognize how much it enriched
life and how it allowed a much more positive outlook on life than seemed
possible before. It provided many answers to questions that had plagued
me until then. Indeed it seemed like “the big answer”. Now I find that
it was a stepping-stone to a bigger answer that adds significantly to
my understanding of reincarnation and then goes far beyond. As a specific;
while reincarnation brought me the first adequate appreciation of the
Patience of God, only the life-dream concept made me realize
the true extent of God’s Love and Wisdom.
retrospect, it seems strange that I was aware of this greater concept
for many years and had been making notes as I encountered it in books
or lectures, yet never realized how meaningful it would become later.
The best explanation for that I can come up with is that the references
I found did not discuss the value of the concept to any extent. Ordinarily it was just stated it as a fact. Even in recent
times I found that mystics were not questioned further when they made
such statements, nor was anything more volunteered. It is definitely
included in the Cayce readings in the same way and hard to find as well.
In subsequent research I found that many other readings supported it.
These facts provided me with the incentive to write this article and
others mentioned at the end.
pursuing that research in the ‘readings mine’, I came to realize that
there may be many other undiscovered ‘gems’ in them: one reason being
that Cayce would [though rarely] volunteer information related to the
reading but not requested by the seeker. Probably the most famous case
of this is his casual statement “he was once a monk’ when giving the Arthur H. Lammers reading,
# 5717-1 in 1923. This small phrase opened up the rich treasury of information
on reincarnation in the Edgar Cayce readings: information that could
possibly have been lost. A note by Gladys Davis on 10/5/64 identifies
it as the first reference to reincarnation, and then later, on 9/27/76,
she corrects this statement and says that Rdng. 4841-1 on 4/22/11 mentioned
it first. There, at the top of page 4 we find the phrase " soul
transmigrated' and other relevant statements.
That means the information could have begun to be explored some
12 years earlier. If it were never pursued at all, how much less significant
would the impact of the A.R.E. be today? It would mean that none of
the life-readings would ever have been given.
subject at hand is another very similar circumstance. It was also volunteered
in a reading for a woman who had been his elder sister during the Persian
period. He was then named Uhjltd and she was Uhjltda. It also mentioned
other lives that they had shared. The reading is #259-8, where in pp.
6 it says: " For,
will is the factor that makes for growth in the soul's sleep through
the earth's experience. For,
with the birth of a physical body the soul slumbers; and its dreams
are the deeds by which the soul is judged in its associations with its
fellow man." I found no evidence that anyone paid any attention
to this remark at the time or followed up on it in later readings. Neither
have I heard anything of it since [from A.R.E. that is. I have heard
of it from many other sources]. There seems to be three possibilities
why this is so. #1. People don’t know about it
#2. People don’t want to discuss it for various reasons, or #3.
It is not considered important.
could the dream of our soul be unimportant when we know that the dreams
of our conscious self are highly important? That dream of our
soul is our very life here on earth! This may well be
the most important concept ever given in the readings!
That should eliminate #3.
#1 can be corrected by the usual methods of communication. #2
is the hardest to overcome. It upsets our lifelong, familiar and comfortable
convictions about ‘reality’, but here is a compensating thought; as
our sense of physical reality is weakened, our sense of spiritual reality
is only proper to acknowledge here that we may have introduced a startling
new concept to the reader. You may already feel on the defensive about
your present convictions. You certainly are not prepared to instantly
change them. This is only an introduction to the subject anyway. All
we hope to do is give you an idea of why this subject is worth investigating
and the incentive to do so. Naturally, we are going to put forth supporting
arguments and cannot avoid trying to be convincing. It is being done
with the best intentions and with no expectations about immediate results.
Now let us go on.
you have already recognized that this concept is in itself a confirmation
of ‘As above, so below.’ We spend a large part of our life in sleep
and it is an essential function. The counterpart in the spiritual world
would be that the soul sleeps too! This alone should help us accept
the truth of the statement.
can we go about grasping the implications of this life being a dream?
It is not an easy or short task. My approach was to analyze the commonly
shared characteristics or patterns of familiar night dreams. Then if
we employ “As above, so below” in the analysis, we can apply that pattern
to the soul’s dreams [its many earth lives]. Once we see that one life
here is to the soul as one night’s dream is to us, again the pattern
with only the most basic nature of dreams, that they are unlimited as
to resources and are personally fashioned for us and independent of
all others, we can immediately see life in a completely different way.
We can begin to think of all of life’s events in terms of ‘Why is this
a part of my dream? What is the message, or the test, or the opportunity
given’? [To me or perhaps to all mankind] All sorts of new possibilities
life is a dream it must also mean that SPIRIT is in charge of this world
without it being obvious in the least. That brings up a very important
new insight, perhaps THE most important. It seemed necessary to believe
that free will had to include the right for evildoers to inflict harm
as they chose to do. If we accepted the karma principle, that gave us
an excuse to say they will pay for it later and even to assume that
there are no innocent victims. But why have we assumed any of this?
Only because we needed an answer and we knew of no alternative. Now
we can say that free will need not include the right to force any experience
upon another being. It will however determine our own life experience,
as it should. An evildoer may well see their intent accomplished,
but it will only take place in their life-dream. We do not have to supply
a guilty or willing victim as in the ‘real world’. I consider that a
wonderful improvement. Now consider the statement that goes ‘As we do
it unto the least of these, our brethren, we do it unto God’. It takes
on new meaning, doesn’t it!
we allow this new view only for small circumstances but not for major
events? Perhaps spirit wishes there did not need to be major events
either but if that is all that will get our attention! We would all
like to have our life as well as everyone’s life consist of only ‘pleasant
dreams’ and never nightmares. If we were able to progress properly under
those circumstances, perhaps that could be so.
consider that real life provides very limited opportunities for wealth,
fame, power and the like, but our soul’s education is probably incomplete
without those experiences. Is Spirit to be limited by this situation?
Reading #5575-2 informs us: Is
God’s hand so short that there would not be all that each soul would
require? In addition, if all souls existed at the beginning, did they
have a long wait for the opportunity to experience an earth life?
These are only a few examples of the new possibilities opened
up by this concept.
good thing can be abused. This is no exception. If we see someone in
need of help, can we now say it is not real so we do not have to be
concerned? Of course not! It could be a test of our compassion or generosity.
It is not in our dream by chance. Nothing is. I know that many people
accept that angels are involved in such tests as well as in protection.
Many convincing stories are told about such events. If we can accept
that angels can come into real life now and then, why should it be hard
to accept that they are always present if needed? In all this there
is no reason to think that we do not share real events with real people
as long as those are proper for our experience. If God intended us to
be His companions, as Cayce said, we should certainly have that companionship
with each other, both here and beyond.
statement about life being a dream is also only one of a number of statements
by Cayce that are hard to accept. Many mystics make similar or nearly
identical ones. Moreover, the dream concept actually helps us to understand
how these all could be true! Here are some examples:
happens by chance. #3684-1
plus 3 others.
that in whatever state ye find thyself, that—at the moment—is best for
that what is truly thine cannot be taken away from thee. #2448-2
time is one time. [In 11 readings: so many, the #’s are not even
only that which is good, that which is constructive, that which is true,
that which is spiritual, CAN live, DOES live ON and ON.
all confirm for me that Spirit is indeed in charge of events here on
earth, even those we may be inclined to prematurely classify as bad.
None of these even remotely imply that life is actually as it appears
to be on the surface. All, however, are hard to accept and so ordinarily
they are not discussed either.
What are we to do with those statements? Do we just pick and
choose which we will accept, or reject them all, even tho they come
from a source we have faith in?
is another reading that casts much light upon this whole matter. It
arose from the inquiries of the original
`A Search For God’ study group, formed while Cayce was still
alive. From #262-56:
(Q) Comment upon the following.
Is it worthy of expansion; that is, does it carry any light
of truth? ...... The Creator, in seeking to find or create a being
worthy of companionship, realized that such a being would result only
from a free will exercising its divine inheritance and through its
own efforts find its Maker.
Thus, to make the choice really a Divine one [The Creator]
caused the existence of states of consciousness that would indeed
tax the free will of a soul; thus light and darkness.
Truly, only those tried so as by fire can enter in.
The only variation that we would make is that all souls in the beginning
were one with the Father. The separation, or turning away, brought
evil. Then there became
the necessity of the awareness of self's being out of accord with,
or out of the realm of blessedness; and, as given of the Son, "yet
learned he obedience through the things which he suffered."
answer to the above opened up a new insight for me regarding why we
contend with a lower self here. We may be experiencing now what God
experienced then. A part of us is uncooperative, disobedient or rebellious
just as souls were then. To our own souls we may appear to be the same.
We probably would not learn this lesson any other way. The phrase “tried
as by fire” also explains why some life-dreams are like nightmares.
then our reality, all reality, truly only states of consciousness?
If we say ` Life is a dream’ or say `Life is a state of consciousness’,
isn’t that the same thing? The plural says there is more than one state.
Some mystics list these as the Waking Dream and the Sleeping Dream.
Another mystic uses the same terms and also calls them objective reality
and subjective reality. Another says; “What people call reality does
not exist anywhere. Everything is a dream.” Paramahansa Yogananda speaks
of “the dream atoms of this phenomenal world” and explicitly calls God
“The Divine Dreamer.” These are only a few examples. Many more appear
in another article mentioned later.
is another state that deserves to be mentioned here. It creates what
appears to be a fully awake state, yet one in which the reality of the
hypnotized person is different from those observing. Where has objective
physical reality gone for the person hypnotized?
There are also trance states, meditation states, out-of-body
states, drug induced states and many more. In remote viewing, which
Cayce did routinely while giving readings, he could describe the surroundings
where he went even tho his physical eyes were elsewhere. Regarding eyes,
another mystic, Wm. Blake says; “I question not my corporeal eye any
more than I would question a window concerning a sight. I look through
it and not with it.” Walt Whitman said; “Strange and hard that paradox
true I give; Objects gross and unseen soul are one.” The last is an
another example of ‘As within, so without.’ From Cayce we find this
statement about reality [actually the continuance of 1771-2 quoted earlier]
“And as you learn to stand aside and watch self pass by, there
may come more the knowledge and the comprehension that it is earnest;
it is real; and that the real is rather the unseen than that which is
have gone on without always quoting proper references here. They are
in the other articles I mentioned as having written and which I hope
will now interest you. The two most important are both called `Reincarnation:
Dreams Of The Soul’. Part 1 draws only upon the Cayce material and uses
diagrams primarily. It conveys certain relationships between our dream,
waking, soul and spirit selves. It shows that these states of consciousness
have repeating patterns, long and short cycles, and much more. It identifies
other Readings that support the dream concept. Part 2 relies on words
alone and contains many more supporting references [20 and growing]
such as the ones mentioned. It cites the advantages of a belief in reincarnation
and addresses objections to it that may have deterred many from adopting
the belief. It also analyzes our sleeping dreams more fully and shows
how they have the same characteristics [9 in all] as our soul’s many
life-dreams when examined from the soul’s perspective.
conclusions I have drawn about why life is a dream are supported by
the two mystical principles cited earlier and I have not sought to discount
or deny the painful aspects of life. They still are more positive and
helpful overall than other philosophies I have found. Some parts are
optimistic, it is true, but I believe it is justified. I’m sure you
have heard, as I have, that believing is seeing and not the other way
around. We are also told to pray as tho we have already received an
answer. Didn’t the Master also say, “ As you believe, so shall it be
done unto you.” Did that really only apply to one man and one situation?
I think not. So I believe now that we must have confidence that God
would and did come up with the most perfect, the most loving possible
plan of life. It now seems obvious that only He could have devised
such an ingenious plan and further only He could make it work out.
I further believe that we will someday awaken back in our former
state of blessedness and find we have had no worse than a nightmare
[if we can even remember them since they don’t exist anymore per #1691-1].
No harm permanently befell us or anyone else. Yet we will never lose
the memory of the joys of many lives. It is my sincere hope that you
will be able to agree with this higher view of life and have it become
a part of your beliefs. That is the only way to make it your reality.
Buddhist Interpretation of the Round, “Life is But a Dream”
row, row your boat
down the stream.
merrily, merrily, merrily,
is but a dream.
us break our verse down into its components. Beginning at the final
line, "Life is but a dream." This refers to the doctrine of
Maya, sometimes described as illusion or ignorance. As Meher Baba taught
in Discourses, Vol. III:
is not illusion, it is the creator of illusion. Maya is not false, it
is that which gives false impressions. Maya is not unreal; it is that
which makes the real appear unreal and the unreal appear real. Maya
is not duality, it is that which causes duality."
the influence of Maya we divide the world into categories. We split
the world into "myself" and "others." We fail to
see the unity of all things and our connection to the ultimate reality.
We go through life as if in a dream, failing to see the true nature
of ourselves and our world. Unless we are liberated from Maya we fail
to see that "Life is but a dream," and we are bound by our
attachments to sense-objects and states of mind.
we realize the dreamlike quality of existence we begin disentangling
ourselves from our attachments and cravings, and we open ourselves to
merrily, merrily, merrily,"
now to the second line of our verse, "Gently down the stream,"
we have a reference to the flow of life. This is a metaphor frequently
used in Eastern teachings. For instance, in the Tao Te Ching we find:
the whole is divided, the parts need names.
are already enough names.
must know when to stop.
when to stop averts trouble.
in the world is like a river flowing home to the sea.
how this, like our nursery song, relates the illusory division of things
in the world to the flow of Tao, or the way of living unencumbered by
looking back at our first line, "Row, row, row your boat,"
we can easily see that the "boat" refers to our "self,"
or our life in the stream of existence. "Row, row, row," shows
us that we must direct our lives through skillful application of repetitive
practice. One does not become a skilled rower on the first try. Rather,
one must row, row, row. Thus, like the person giving directions on how
to get to Carnegie Hall, the spiritual advisor will instruct the initiate
that the way to greater realization is "practice, practice, practice."
Ed Ida is a 30+ year student of Edgar Cayce with a philosophical bent
and a retired electronic instrument designer. You may email him at
** Quoted in Reader’s Digest, May, 1998. from Manhood of Humanity,
By Alfred Korzybski, Institute of General Semantics.